|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Sapphire Voice
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
2
   |
Posted - 2017.06.09 12:12:04 -
[1] - Quote
Oh! I know what CCP does when it's own team is lazy to find a solution. They post a completely insane announcement, and then waiting till smart players will post a bit less stupid solution on that stupid nerf in their comments. 
And at the end then they will say that this decision was based on our comments!!! 
Just watch it! I swear they will implement that stupid nerf. And If that will gonna happen I will unsub all my Supers alts.
No jokes CCP!!! |
Sapphire Voice
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
3
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 12:18:20 -
[2] - Quote
Faruzen en Divalone wrote:CCP has statistics for almost everything.
It means, that they probably do have it covered with data telling them carrier and super ratting is just OP money faucet, even compared to incursions so reason is surely there. Also, Incursions are group activity and actually need a lot of organization compared to solo ratting in null so thats one point why Incursions are not targeted probably.
However, nerfing Fighter damage overall is IMHO "easy solution", which is bad. I am afraid to take my carrier into PVP as it is bacause I can be killed easily by couple of subcaps because of being almost immobile and easily hunted down, my high damage and jump drive is the only thing that makes my Thanatos Carrier different from Dominix.
If problem is Capitals in PVE, then the addressed problem should be CARRIERS AND PVE, not carriers overall. I do understand that you propably dont want to reduce anomaly payouts, because that would also nerf all other ratters, not only carrier users. So, the best solution IMO would be to code rats some special "fighter resistance" or "fighter damage taken reduction". You can play with that number then to optimize ISK ticks to some reasonable levels.
Nerfing carriers in PVP is bad. They are weak already IMO.
You know what CCP will say on this: Nah , that's too complicated to code we don't have so much time to do that. And yeah we want PVPers to suffer as well. Because we can! |
Sapphire Voice
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
3
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 12:53:04 -
[3] - Quote
Eye-Luv-Girls wDaddyIssues wrote:Personally I think all the changes of late are all good. Its way too easy for people en mass to farm the game.
There shouldnt be any sources of AFK, Passive Income.
Well done ccp.
You got payed by CCP or what?)))) |
Sapphire Voice
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
5
|
Posted - 2017.06.13 00:47:27 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote:
Our secondary goal is that Carriers and Supercarriers are too effective in PvP, even for the investment it takes to create them. This change will shift the PvP balance, but weGÇÖre confident that Carriers and Supercarriers will remain powerful options for PvP battles.
WHAT ?????? Are -âou serious???? CARRIERS TOO EFFECTIVE IN PvP ????? AHAHAH !!!!!
Who are you man?
Are you even play this game at all?
Who is that primary idiot who suppose to eat this kind "answer" ?
REDUCE THE DAMN BOUNTY FOR F SAKE!!!! HOW LONG WE SHOULD TELL YOU THIS !!! ???? |
|
|
| |
|